Bent Judge
James Goss

The whole case revolves around the tape/ transcripts between the prosecution barristers and DR Lowe. they have been microscopically checked and dissected word by word, second by second.

Dr Jan Lowe himself admits his forensic evidence has been changed after the fact.

over 75.5% of this cross examination is missing and what in reality was proven not to be possible suddenly in the remaining 24.5% it states the crime to be possible which is simply lies. 

​

The first of my 2 medical experts was Dr Jan lowe an independent pathologist and the second was Dr Lord the police surgeon whose examination of all the physical evidence  proved the crime to be not possible. 

​

The complainant threw punches towards me, (the defendant Charlton Harris), I
attempted to block them by protecting my face, he then kicked me with a
sweeping kick to my lower left leg which resulted in a large bruise. We both lost
balance, so in self defence I pushed him away because people were behind
me. We both fell BACKWARDS in the direction from where the complainant had
come from and struggled on the floor for a minuet or so where there was
broken glass. THIS WAS BACKED UP 1000 BY DR JAN LOWE IN REALITY AT
COURT.

 

1st AN INDEPENDENT PATHOLOGIST (Dr JAN LOWE )
male. 2nd THE POLICE SURGEON (DR LESLEY LORD,)Female.  WHO NEVER TURNED UP!
For ONE YEAR TWO AND A HALF MONTHS, I Instructed my "Defence Barrister" Mr
Bassra to subpoena her to court, he lied to me because 5 minutes before the trial
started he then told me she is not coming. My reply was "Well I am going home
then because I am not being railroaded because the sheer existence and
causation of her medical findings are VITAL' because they back up the defence
case 100% and prove that their one witness must have lied because he said there
was NO STRUGGLE!! His reply to that was " If you go home now it will alienate
you with the trial Judge but don't worry , you Still have one medical expert here"!!
That was Dr Jan Lowe who's EVIDENCE THEY CHANGED AFTER THE FACT!
1st Defence Expert
Dr JAN LOWE'S REPORT MATCH THE DEFENCE CASE 100%
DEFENCE PICTURES BELOW

The prosecution barristers cross examination of Dr lowe. He said ; this question to the only harmful witness. this question is very very important here , when Harris  hit out at complainant was that it because this will become critical later on in this trial. He replied yes that was it. This is the main difference between the prosecution and the defences case and this has been removed from the the doctored transcripts..

​

DR LOWE'S PURPOSE OF REPORT
I note that you wish me to address whether the injuries sustained by the
complainant are more in keeping with having been struck by a bottle in the face
or with him being involved in a struggle on the floor where there was broken
glass.
DR LOWE'S CONCLUSIONS
1st_ THE DEFENDANT The injuries to both shoulders, the right collarbone and
both forearms sustained by your client, Mr Harris, are entirely in keeping with him
having been involved. in a struggle and having been kicked on the outer side of his
left leg. The 3 separate incised wounds on the hand points to him falling on his
outstretched hand onto glass AND NOT CONSISTANT WITH SOMEBODY WHO WAS
HOLDING A BROKEN GLASS IN AN ATTACK!

​

SHORT DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT
Mr Harris told me that he had been in a scuffle and that someone had kicked him
on the left leg. In self defence he had pushed the other person away and they
both fell to the floor onto several bottles and glasses.
DR LORD'S CONCLUSIONS
FIRSTLY BOTH THE MEDICAL EXPERTS CONCLUDED THE SHEER EXISTENCE OF ALL
THE INJURIES TO BOTH PARTIES PROVES 100% THE ONE AND ONLY
PROSECUTION WITNESS BELOW MUST HAVE LIED!!
SECONDLY BOTH THE MEDICAL EXPERTS CONCLUDED THAT ALL THE INJURIES TO
BOTK PARTIES WERE ASSOCIATED!!
IN REALITY AT COURT
THE PROSECUTION CASE (THEY HAD NO MEDICAL EXPERTS)
Their ONE and ONLY prosecution witness said I twice hit a bottle on the edge of
the table before it broke, then ran at the Complainant from 5 feet, hitting him with
a single blow in his chest/face with him FALLING BACKWARDS ALONE. See Crime
Not Possible. Then for an unknown man to hold him up immediately after he'd
gone down. Supposedly the whole incident lasting between 3-5 SECONDS
according to this solitary witness who is a self confessed perjurer. We have 100%
PROOF OF THIS IN THE CROWN COURT TAPED AND TRANSCRIPT EVIDENCE!
THE ABSOLUTE MOST IMPORTANT THING THIS PERJURER HAS MISSED OUT IN
THIS COMPENSATION SCAM IS THERE IS NO MENTION OF ANY STRUGGLE
BETWEEN US BOTH WHICH IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE TO BOTH THE MEDICAL
EXPERTS FACTS BECAUSE THE STRUGGLE INJURIES SIMPLY EXIST. YOU JUST
CANT PRETEND THAT THEY ARE NOT THEREL!

​

The only admission in Dr Lowe's report which MAY fit with the prosecution case is
the one and only main injury to the complainants nose ( marked in green ).But the
sheer existence of all associated injuries to both parties, gives the prosecution
case no chance of possibility (0%).

​

VIDEO BECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE ACTUAL CROSS EXAMINATION OF Dr LOWE BY
THE PROSECUTION BARRISTER (Mr HARING) FOR ABSOLUTE CLARITY!!

​

VIDEO 1 SETTING THE SCENE OF THE INCIDENT.
VIDEO 2 THE ACTUAL PROSECUTION CASE,
A single bottle blow to the
complainants face /chest to cause the nose, cheek and ear injuries WITH HIM
FALLING BACKWARDS ALONE which was PROVEN NOT POSSIBLE AT COURT. This
bombshell dropped because Dr Lowe made Mr Haring accept the complainants 3
separate injuries to his left cheek and the injury to the back of his left ear MUST
HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY STRUGGLING IN GLASS ON THE FLOOR 100%...ALSO his
nose, cheek and ear injuries were ALL ASSOCIATED AND HAPPENED AT THE SAME
TIME!!


​

VIDEO 3 Mr HARING'S IMPROVISED NEW VERSION TO FIT THESE MEDICALLY
PROVEN FACTS.....said, physically tongue in cheek, bearing in mind EVERYBODY
EVEN THE COMPLAINANT HIMSELF SAID HE FELL BACKWARDS,1st "What if Harris
hits the complainant in the nose with the BOTTLE for his main injury,2nd then the
complainant falling 5 FEET FORWARDS with his hands by his side to fall on
the GLASS which had come off the SAME BOTTLE moments earlier, to cause his
cheek and ear injuries struggling in that SAME GLASS on the floor ON HIS OWNI!
Dr Lowe said NO WAY, they were ALL ASSOCIATED and happened AT THE SAME
TIME AND DEFINITELY NOT TWO SEPARATE INCIDENTS!! OBVIOUSLY Dr LOWE
NEVER ACCEPTED THIS GARBAGE!! 

​

"I Go TO JAIL FOR FIVE YEARS but then I set a UK precedent because I tell the parole board "I'm not admitting to a crime which was proven in reality in court impossible"........ i get parole, It's never happened before and It's never happened since!!
I TRY TO GET THE TRIAL WRITTEN TRANSCRIPTS/DOCUMENTS AND THEN THE CROWN COURT TAPES To PROVE GOSS'S LIES IN HIS SUMMING UP.
JUDGE JAMES GosS FINDS OUT OFF MR BASSRA AND ROBIN FRIEZE and changes the written transcripts/documents and tapes to match his lies in his summing up so the prosecution case appears possible for anyone who reads the written transcript at a later date who is trying to get an appeal. (see the video reconstructions of this tampered written transcript above in video 4 and 5 and have a good laugh at the FICTICIOUS FALLING 5 FEET FORWARDS GARBAGE!!)


 

THE OFFICIAL BRADFORD CROWN COURTS OWN TIMED RECORDS PROVES UNDENIABLY DEFENCE MEDICAL EXPERT DR LOWE'S EVIDENCE HAS BEEN CHANGED AFTER THE FACT.(**see official document below**)
. THIS MEANS JUDGE JAMES GOsS IS GUILTY OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE.